Skip to content

Ecosystem And Study Roadmap

PQID-Bench is distributed through several coordinated research objects. They serve different audiences and should not be interpreted as duplicate or competing versions.

Which Object Should I Use?

Objective Primary object Why
evaluate a new model Hugging Face benchmark distribution ready-to-use records, fixed splits, test prompts, response template, schemas, and compact core archive
install commands or use Python pqid-bench on PyPI lightweight CLI and importable API for acquisition, planning, collection, isolated replay, scoring, comparison, and reporting
reproduce or audit the completed study PQID-Bench v1.0.0 on Zenodo frozen model responses, evaluator traces, analyses, checksums, and repeatability evidence
inspect or contribute to the implementation GitHub maintained source, tests, examples, manuals, CI, and selected evidence
reproduce generated-code execution GHCR evaluator container pinned, network-disabled Docker execution environment
browse results without running code interactive evidence explorer read-only Plotly presentation generated from frozen evidence
inspect the plan for the next study PQID-Bench 2 OSF registration immutable prospective protocol; no PQID-Bench 2 observations or results

The shortest adoption path is:

python -m pip install "pqid-bench>=1.2,<2"
pqid-bench download --version 1.0.0

The shortest evidence-reproduction path instead begins with the Zenodo archive or GitHub evidence repository. A user does not need the full Zenodo archive to benchmark a new model.

Current Study: PQID-Bench v1.0.0

PQID-Bench v1.0.0 is the completed, frozen study object. It contains a 734-record generation population, deterministic 514 / 66 / 154 splits, a 154-prompt held-out panel, the frozen 21-model matrix, and the current operational and reference-structure scoring contract.

Software can evolve without changing those scientific objects. For that reason, benchmark version 1.0.0, Python-package version 1.2.1, evaluator identifier pqid-bench-evaluator-1.1.0-safe-builtins, and container version 1.0.0 are separate identifiers.

Future Study: PQID-Bench 2

PQID-Bench 2 is not a patch release, an extra split, or an unreported result from the current study. It is a separately governed future investigation that extends the measurement ladder from operational admissibility and reference-structure recovery to semantic validity.

Its primary registered question concerns the model-level Semantic Void state: an output executes but fails a preregistered semantic oracle. Secondary questions examine semantically valid structural divergence and controlled contrasts across quantum-algorithm family, audited prompt scope, and explicit algorithm-name visibility. These are descriptive and inferential questions within a future frozen panel, not causal claims.

What Does OSF Preregistration Mean?

The Open Science Framework registration is an immutable, timestamped snapshot of the study plan. It records what will be tested and how key decisions will be made before the relevant outputs are observed. This protects the distinction between:

  • confirmatory analysis, whose hypotheses and decision rules were fixed in advance; and
  • exploratory analysis, whose questions may arise after observing data.

The Stage 1 registration fixes the research questions, constructs, eligibility principles, semantic-oracle classes, contrast families, analysis hierarchy, and noncontamination rules. It explicitly states that no PQID-Bench 2 model output has been collected.

A second public registration is required before data collection. Stage 2 must freeze the exact prompt identities and hashes, qualified semantic oracles, sample size and precision target, model-provider routes, collection rules, and executable analysis-code commit. No PQID-Bench 2 model call is permitted until that gate is complete.

What Is O6?

The current research supplement labels the prospective registration pointer Overview object O6. The O prefix distinguishes administrative overview objects from the frozen analytical sequence of Supplemental Tables S1-S34. O6 does not contain another analysis of the current benchmark. It tells readers where to inspect the independently timestamped contract for the future PQID-Bench 2 study.

Citation Boundary

Cite the object actually used:

  • cite PQID-Bench v1.0.0 for the benchmark and completed evidence;
  • cite PQID v1.0.2 separately for the upstream source dataset;
  • cite the software package when its tooling is material to the work; and
  • cite the OSF DOI only when discussing the prospective PQID-Bench 2 protocol.

The OSF registration should not be cited as evidence that a PQID-Bench 2 hypothesis has already been supported.